Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephanie Howlett's avatar

What I read said, be hungry, touch only a piece of a plant, still be hungry, touch that piece more, still be hungry, eat that piece, still be hungry, eat a few more pieces, still be hungry... Holy crap. So basically, they are agreeing with you. Just starve and get over it.

Neural Foundry's avatar

Solid debunking of survivalist dogma. The opporunity cost angle is particularly sharp because everyone fixates on food scarcity when shelter and water are way more urgent in most scenarios. I once spent three days in backcountry with basically no calories and yeah it sucked but hypothermia would've killed me in hours. The 1500-3000 plant part calculation really undercuts the practcality argument.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?